G'day:
A few days back I got a bit stroppy with a plagiarist: "Imitation might be the sincerest form of flattery, but...".
I note that James has deleted the page(s) in question.
Instead of simply citing the work properly (ie: put the creative commons attribution on it).
How weird is that? It seems to me it was not an exercise in helping the community, it was an exercise in bigging himself up. Via knocking-off someone else's work.
Dubious.
Still: all's well that ends well, I guess.
--
Adam